There is a link to TX secretary of state:
https://www.sos.state.tx.us/statdoc/faqs3400.shtml
and full text:
https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/BC/htm/BC.302.htm
The listed exemptions:
Are there exemptions?
The law exempts certain companies from the registration requirement. These exemptions include, but are not limited to:
-
Certain publicly traded companies and their subsidiaries
-
Certain financial institutions
-
Educational institutions
-
501(c)(3) nonprofits
-
Businesses marketing the sale of food
-
Retail sellers with brick and mortar locations if it has operated under the same name for the last two years and a majority of sales occur at retail locations
-
Businesses contacting their current or former customers if that business has operated under the same business name for the last two years
SO we can SMS current and former customers.
IS a double opted-in subscriber to our SMS list a “customer” ?
I asked ChatGPT
SO is a double opted in (consented) SMS SUBSCRIBER a “customer” in the eyes of Texas?
ChatGPT:
is a double opted in (consented) SMS SUBSCRIBER a “customer” in the eyes of Texas? re: @https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/BC/htm/BC.302.htm
ChatGPT said:
Under Chapter 302 of the Texas Business & Commerce Code (regulating telephone solicitation) — including SMS messages treated as “telephone calls” — the relevant definitions are:
Notably, the term “customer” is not defined in Chapter 302 — so a double‑opt‑in SMS subscriber does not qualify as a “customer” under that chapter.
In contrast, in Chapter 304, which implements the Texas Telemarketing Disclosure and Privacy Act, additional definitions include “consumer” and “established business relationship”:
Thus:
-
A person who opts in via double opt-in to receive SMS messages is not automatically a “customer” under Chapter 302, because they’re not necessarily a purchaser or a party to a transaction.
-
However, that person may be considered a “consumer” (if they fit the consumer‑good/service context) under Chapter 304, and any SMS that qualifies as telemarketing must comply with consent, disclosure, and opt-out requirements.
Summary
| Definition/Term | Applies to a double‑opt‑in SMS subscriber? |
|---|
| “Customer” under Chapter 302 | No — that term isn’t defined and doesn’t align here |
| “Purchaser” under Chapter 302 | No, unless they purchased or rented something |
| “Consumer” under Chapter 304 | Yes, if receiving marketing content for consumer goods/services |
| Telemarketing “call” includes SMS | Yes, Chapter 304 explicitly treats it as such |
So, to your question: a double opt‑in SMS subscriber is not a “customer” under Texas Chapter 302, but they could be a “consumer” under Chapter 304 if the messages constitute telemarketing content. Let me know if you’d like to look at any exemption or additional provision around consent requirements.
===
There is grey area in the text – “customer” vs. “consumer”
A person who opts in via double opt-in to receive SMS messages is not automatically a “customer” under Chapter 302, because they’re not necessarily a purchaser or a party to a transaction.
However, that person may be considered a “consumer” (if they fit the consumer‑good/service context) under Chapter 304, and any SMS that qualifies as telemarketing must comply with consent, disclosure, and opt-out requirements.
Because I am obsessive with SMS opt-in, and I know I am not sending to anyone who hasn’t double opted in, not gonna think about this at all.
If my SMS list consent was sloppy/not double opted in, and not in business for 2 years, I would ask a lawyer
I am not a lawyer. My advice is worthless.
In my opinion, Klaviyo should have added the part about the exemptions, and Klaviyo with well paid lawyers, could have identified that customer and consumer is a Texas law grey area that is not clear.