Skip to main content
Problem Solver I
August 13, 2026
Solved

TV app subscription events not syncing reliably with Klaviyo

  • August 13, 2026
  • 1 reply
  • 53 views

I’m working on a TV app and want to use Klaviyo for lifecycle messaging based on user activity, such as when someone signs up, starts a subscription, renews, or cancels.

For anyone who has integrated a TV/streaming app with Klaviyo, what’s the cleanest way to structure these events and customer properties? I’m particularly interested in whether it’s better to send these events directly through the Klaviyo API or sync them through another platform.

Also, are there any common issues I should watch out for with duplicate events or keeping subscription status in sync?

Would appreciate hearing how others have approached this.

Best answer by Temi O.

Hi ​@danielmartinhq, hope you’re doing well! For this type of integration, and from what I’ve seen for other subscription models in Klaviyo, I’d recommend a combination of events and profile properties. 

Use custom events for the actions themselves, such as sign-up, subscription started, renewal, and cancellation. Events preserve the timeline and can include details like plan, price, billing interval, platform, and cancellation reason. Keep the customer’s current state in profile properties, such as subscription status, current plan, and next renewal date. Klaviyo’s data model explains this distinction, and the Events API can be used to send those activity events directly. 

Sending directly through the API is generally a good option if your app or backend is the source of truth. A middleware or CDP (like users managing subscriptions through Skio, for example) can also work well if it already handles identity matching, retries, transformations, and monitoring. The most important thing is to use one clearly defined source for each event and profile update rather than sending the same data through multiple paths.

For duplicate events, send a stable, unique ID for every real event. For example, use the individual renewal or invoice ID for renewals, not only the subscription ID, and keep the profile identifier consistent. It’s also worth deciding which system wins if events arrive late or out of order, especially for cancellations and renewals.

I hope this information is useful, and I’m curious to hear from other community members that may have approached this similarly/differently! 

 


Temi@Klaviyo

1 reply

Temi O.
Community Manager
Temi O.Answer
Community Manager
August 17, 2026

Hi ​@danielmartinhq, hope you’re doing well! For this type of integration, and from what I’ve seen for other subscription models in Klaviyo, I’d recommend a combination of events and profile properties. 

Use custom events for the actions themselves, such as sign-up, subscription started, renewal, and cancellation. Events preserve the timeline and can include details like plan, price, billing interval, platform, and cancellation reason. Keep the customer’s current state in profile properties, such as subscription status, current plan, and next renewal date. Klaviyo’s data model explains this distinction, and the Events API can be used to send those activity events directly. 

Sending directly through the API is generally a good option if your app or backend is the source of truth. A middleware or CDP (like users managing subscriptions through Skio, for example) can also work well if it already handles identity matching, retries, transformations, and monitoring. The most important thing is to use one clearly defined source for each event and profile update rather than sending the same data through multiple paths.

For duplicate events, send a stable, unique ID for every real event. For example, use the individual renewal or invoice ID for renewals, not only the subscription ID, and keep the profile identifier consistent. It’s also worth deciding which system wins if events arrive late or out of order, especially for cancellations and renewals.

I hope this information is useful, and I’m curious to hear from other community members that may have approached this similarly/differently! 

 


Temi@Klaviyo